🔗 Share this article

Jennifer Lawrence has become part of the growing list of actors who express doubts about the essential need of on-set intimacy professionals, revealing she opted against their services while filming her latest project her upcoming film.

Examining the Role of On-Set Intimacy Professionals

Intimacy coordinators were introduced following the #MeToo movement to ensure the safety and ease of actors during sequences involving nudity and sexual content. Yet, several prominent actors including Gwyneth Paltrow and other established stars have voiced concerns about their involvement, with some suggesting they interfere with creative flow.

Lawrence's Personal Experience

In conversation on the Las Culturistas podcast, while promoting her new film where she plays a character descending into mental health challenges, Lawrence stated: "We did not have an intimacy coordinator, or perhaps we had the option but didn't really utilize them... I felt completely safe with Rob."

She continued: "Rob is completely professional and very committed to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations primarily focused on family life and personal connections. There was never uncomfortable moments or doubts about professional limits."

"If there was the slightest indication of discomfort, I definitely would have insisted on an intimacy coordinator. Many male actors take offense if you don't reciprocate their advances, and then the retaliation starts. Rob was not like that."

Industry Recognition and Continuing Discussion

Recently, entertainment database IMDb officially recognized intimacy coordinators as a distinct credit, alongside eleven other crew positions including choreography, craft services, and puppetry. Previously, they were grouped under "miscellaneous staff" rather than having their own designation.

Notwithstanding this validation, intimacy coordinators still encounter media scrutiny implying they might not be industry essential, with well-known performers declining their involvement. Jennifer's viewpoint mirrors that of Jennifer Aniston, who earlier shared she declined professional supervision while working with Jon Hamm on The Morning Show.

Jennifer's Perspective

"Jon was extremely respectful – I mean every move, between takes, 'You comfortable?'" she remembered. "It was also carefully planned. That's the benefit of working with skilled editors, appropriate music. So, you don't prepare."

She added, "Production suggested, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I thought, 'Honestly, this is awkward enough!' We're seasoned actors – we can manage appropriately. And we had Mimi on set."

Additional Cases and Professional Response

Although including multiple sequences of sexual activity and frequent nudity, the award-winning film – the director's acclaimed film about a sex worker and a wealthy heir – filmed without an intimacy coordinator.

Mikey Madison explained she and co-star Mark Eydelshteyn "decided it would be best to maintain privacy."

"The role I play is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had studied the director's work and recognized his commitment to authenticity. I was professionally ready for it. As an performer, I treated it as professional work."

Her comments provoked significant backlash from intimacy coordinators, similar to the reaction to Gwyneth Paltrow's public statements, who earlier this year shared that filming her new movie her latest film marked her first encounter with the relatively new profession, which she "was unaware of previously."

Paltrow's Perspective

When asked about comfort level with a particular action alongside fellow actor Timothée Chalamet, the actress responded: "I belong to the era where you remove clothing, you assume position, the camera's on."

Paltrow added that she and her co-star then told the coordinator: "We believe we're comfortable. You can step back.' I don't know how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, extremely restricted by that."

Professional Reaction

Following these comments, industry executive Caroline Hollick labeled them "concerning" and highlighted that most of those speaking against intimacy coordinators have established careers to maintain personal authority and security on production locations.

"Periodically an actor shares opinions about whether they appreciate intimacy coordinators or not," commented the executive. "Gwyneth Paltrow mentioned she came of age in a period when people in Hollywood 'took our kit off and got on with it'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood working with a man considerably junior than her, while I'm sure Chalamet is comfortable, I found it quite an irresponsible statement."

Male Perspective

Michael Douglas, meanwhile, shared that he believes the primary responsibility during intimate sequences rests with the male actor, instead of a external professional.

"In my experience, you assume duty as the man to make certain the woman is at ease, you discuss it completely," he explained. "You state, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's acceptable'. It's extremely careful but appears like it's occurring organically, which is ideally what convincing acting looks like."